IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-11

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 05 September 2016 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BEF12B423 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wS6FMsADeEwV for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A4012B27B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3sSchK39Yrz3lY for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:50:25 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1473097825; bh=rI9gwIfwSKmRj76dUFYl6WTISlj0DJlG+FkyO7FqIzQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=IX7LxbBICOUjx81FFQwiftPVOGDv02Hh+YeYz288RABQWOS/4i6EpwS5GtVEiLLSm pfOTD11G1OCK84TVBh+d9E21z3ZySTMXy4AWr8REpFkOySSg1UoUhiLN3l/+Y/qAo3 +fas6Bwqvi4LwGQ7fs/TuGK38maIgHXhjR7OwSN4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18WuV2tYw2wL for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 19:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B147C19C32B; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 bofh.nohats.ca B147C19C32B
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E39540D729F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:50:21 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR09MB14403260340F6DBF4DADCD8DF0E40@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1609051349270.26494@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <MWHPR09MB14403260340F6DBF4DADCD8DF0E40@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LRH 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/-tx5lVM3B4Uih7xKNqlewlztbUY>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] WGLC on draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-11
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 17:50:29 -0000

On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) wrote:

> This message starts a Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-11.
>
> The version to be reviewed is https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ipsecme-rfc4307bis-11.txt.
>
> Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until September 19th, 2016.  If you believe that the document is ready to be submitted to the IESG for consideration as a Standards Track RFC please send a short message stating this.

And since a lot of the regular active people on this list are
co-authors, it is extra important to hear from others!

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email