Re: [IPsec] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5282 (3606)

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 April 2013 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4911421F9E1B for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8P5ZPw7WaShZ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com (mail-ea0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE7221F9E3F for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id h10so2588941eaj.38 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wj5g7L6BcaEEIkFW/ZkMFGdB/YcZ4O9wN5qwwPKM1kc=; b=jMGvhRs44rjvnGi3aEnvecQ+7QDZzlbWrNjuRHMaym2a6Sah/EvImQSwNrXAKlz9Mj M6foqHSBFQ5Mg95rJYlihuLSzkNiRYYa5lfoVirk2jEO7QWdRRGRmfpH325VnKdKk8dC rJxtIOIYsI7RQKbJf/g20tZM+nd8X66wpbJ/XTGf1jkT4eZJoXcOyZ7IT41+5TXOs98a m0anGuYiLRL4zJu4lnS4h1UqHTFcGarYkyGiPtmU9PqGuGMBHTraATwggQXTPlyaAzqn BFTerlhSPWoi59WvqwSogEAEwHz9/tStPIHhSMAK31pzJqUNV3/g/aZH3RAUwsYyuWGv COqg==
X-Received: by 10.15.34.199 with SMTP id e47mr101950397eev.35.1367247269143; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.199.139] (diup-241-234.inter.net.il. [213.8.241.234]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k43sm33296309een.2.2013.04.29.07.54.27 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <517E89A2.4040508@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 17:54:26 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130329 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
References: <20130425210908.2988DB1E002@rfc-editor.org> <517E82FF.2040706@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <517E82FF.2040706@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Fwd: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5282 (3606)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 14:54:42 -0000

Yes (to both).

Thanks,
	Yaron

On 2013-04-29 17:26, Sean Turner wrote:
> The following errata was submitted and I'm inclined to mark it approved
> unless I hear otherwise.
>
> spt
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5282 (3606)
> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:09:08 -0700 (PDT)
> From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> To: black_david@emc.com, mcgrew@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org
> CC: wtc@google.com, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5282,
> "Using Authenticated Encryption Algorithms with the Encrypted Payload of
> the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) Protocol".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5282&eid=3606
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Wan-Teh Chang <wtc@google.com>
>
> Section: 10.1.4
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>     This algorithm is identical to AEAD_AES_256_GCM (see Section 5.2 of
>     [RFC5116], except that the tag length, t, is 12 and an authentication
>     tag with a length of 12 octets (64 bits) is used.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>     This algorithm is identical to AEAD_AES_256_GCM (see Section 5.2 of
>     [RFC5116], except that the tag length, t, is 12 and an authentication
>     tag with a length of 12 octets (96 bits) is used.
>
> Notes
> -----
> "(64 bits)" should be changed to "(96 bits)".
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5282 (draft-black-ipsec-ikev2-aead-modes-01)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Using Authenticated Encryption Algorithms with the
> Encrypted Payload of the Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) Protocol
> Publication Date    : August 2008
> Author(s)           : D. Black, D. McGrew
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : IETF - NON WORKING GROUP
> Area                : N/A
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
>