Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 21 November 2018 06:03 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2340130EDF; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:03:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EMiaRPHYAgq; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BBA712D4EA; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:03:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430BpR4Sw1zLDZ; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:03:43 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1542780223; bh=JmNt8n20kaLvQcG9x+8BHFYA1vt1euDmjeCj5ul7FjA=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=h+Ob69TOVAPQKYjO95BedUISih8ulJn0ycunP3UzPlgshYfquNZ9MvET8pXGehTFb 7deqqzxEiM9uqRsb0YcTgcV1nkggx0XSB/zJBZ3OwRN12zCjdMaovcjgJ03smXmOoe 2buwrvG4jjbVz4uWWsCQzFvPb/rSOlebAgPT+lIs=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FjyIv1wEw38F; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:03:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:03:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E796D3797AD; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:03:41 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca E796D3797AD
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFEB41C3B2E; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:03:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:03:41 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ipsec@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns@ietf.org, david.waltermire@nist.gov
In-Reply-To: <154265994634.16507.11786093943228748567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811210102100.29140@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <154265994634.16507.11786093943228748567.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/2KxYJsP-69-dZa26Ol3IByI8ahM>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:03:50 -0000
On Mon, 19 Nov 2018, Alissa Cooper wrote: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Section 5: > > "Enterprise Certificate Agency" --> I would have expected this to say > Enterprise Certificate Authority. Your expectation is correct :) I will fix. > "Other generic or public domains, such as top-level domains, similarly SHOULD > NOT be whitelisted." Under what exceptional circumstances would it make sense > to whitelist a TLD? Is this like if I run Example Corp and I own .example? Exactly. Or if you would use .internal or if Warren gets his way .alt :) Paul
- [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-iet… Alissa Cooper
- Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Paul Wouters
- Re: [IPsec] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft… Alissa Cooper