[IPsec] Important: One-week WG review of newest draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 10 June 2014 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AF21A0359 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.347
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xurR_1_1Rfw0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC1451A0109 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-51-90.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.8/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s5ANC3Cq009179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:12:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-51-90.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.51.90] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A22392D-264E-421E-9508-E6F0E38056FA@vpnc.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:12:01 -0700
To: IPsec ME WG List <ipsec@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.2\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.2)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/2ZF7mfG_UH-BAS0sIvo-tyOgEro
Subject: [IPsec] Important: One-week WG review of newest draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:12:06 -0000
Greetings again. The IESG had a lot of questions and concerns about draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation during their review. Valery made a large number of changes to the text to help clarify the language, particularly around PMTU. The current draft and all the IESG comments can be found at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-fragmentation/ Before we take Valery's changes back to the IESG, we want to be sure that the WG agrees on all the text and, if not, makes more clarifications. Please send any comments to the list by Tuesday, June 17. --Paul Hoffman
- [IPsec] Important: One-week WG review of newest d… Paul Hoffman