Re: [IPsec] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol

[Yaron Sheffer <[e-mail]>]

Hi everyone,

The 2-week LC period is up today. I'm afraid we got much less review 
than we would have liked, and further review/comments would be very welcome.

However since we've had good WG input on earlier iterations of this 
document, we are asking Sean, the security AD, to progress the draft.

Thanks,
     Yaron

On 03/09/2011 09:34 PM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
> This begins a two-week Working Group Last Call on
> draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol. You can find the current version at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsecha-protocol-04. We
> want everyone in the WG to read the document and comment on it, even if
> the comment is "I support this" or "I am neutral on this". If you oppose
> moving the draft forwards, or you have technical changes you want made,
> please be explicit in your message. Feel free to start new threads if
> you are objecting or suggesting changes. The authors will manage any
> such discussions using the issue tracker.
>
> The WG previously reached consensus on a problem statement for IPsec
> High Availability, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6027. You may wish to
> refer to that RFC, first, to frame the problem, and second, to convince
> yourselves that the current document actually addresses it in full.
>
> Thanks,
> Yaron
>