[IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09
Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Sun, 04 July 2010 14:18 UTC
Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D4C63A67E3 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 07:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AnXGM7T1yfs4 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 07:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C650E3A65A6 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-CheckPoint: {4C30A4E5-0-1B221DC2-2FFFF}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id o64EI8Dr011886; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:18:08 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:18:39 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:18:07 +0300
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09
Thread-Index: Acsbg8wXXgMzpNRbQfaj9D8mMbTskQ==
Message-ID: <9FBCCA7F-DBD5-47A7-BCEE-1B1949388E65@checkpoint.com>
References: <20100704141523.82CCF3A6864@core3.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9FBCCA7FDBD547A7BCEE1B1949388E65checkpointcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
Subject: [IPsec] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 14:18:14 -0000
Hi. I've submitted version -09 of the draft. This has nothing to do with the recently-published IPR statement. It is about addressing last call comments from David Harrington. Yoav Begin forwarded message: From: IETF I-D Submission Tool <idsubmission@ietf.org<mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org>> Date: July 4, 2010 5:15:22 PM GMT+03:00 To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com<mailto:ynir@checkpoint.com>> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09 A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha-09.txt has been successfully submitted by Yoav Nir and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha Revision: 09 Title: IPsec Cluster Problem Statement Creation_date: 2010-07-04 WG ID: ipsecme Number_of_pages: 13 Abstract: This document defines terminology, problem statement and requirements for implementing IKE and IPsec on clusters. It also describes gaps in existing standards and their implementation that need to be filled, in order to allow peers to interoperate with clusters from different vendors. An agreed terminology, problem statement and requirements will allow IETF working gropus to consider development of IPsec/IKEv2 mechanisms to simplify cluster implementations. The IETF Secretariat. Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.