[IPsec] IPsecME WG report
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Thu, 12 November 2009 03:49 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EDE28C1EA; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:49:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.681
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.681 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwE+nSI1OCzX; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:49:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C332028C1EE; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:48:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id nAC3nFc6018888; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:49:15 +0200 (IST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) with mapi; Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:49:18 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: "saag@ietf.org" <saag@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:49:13 +0200
Thread-Topic: IPsecME WG report
Thread-Index: AcpjSxlUYagSMqn2TV+/4QxI9+z5IQ==
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF872C10F@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF872C10Filex01adche_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] IPsecME WG report
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 03:49:18 -0000
IPsecME met this morning. We have one RFC (IKEv2 Redirect) recently published, and a couple more in the RFC Editor queue. The other "small" drafts are coming along as well. The group is making progress on IKEv2-bis, and we had a presentation on one thorny protocol issue that was resolved by a design team. Our goal is to move it out of the WG *before* the next F2F meeting. The bulk of the meeting was presentation of 7 candidate work items. The group was polled for volunteer reviewers and contributors for each of these. This process will continue on the mailing list, and eventually we will propose a new charter, retaining the number of concurrent work items. On the process side, we had one presenter on an audio bridge - which worked fine - and another as a prerecorded "podcast", which also worked after some technical fumbling.
- [IPsec] IPsecME WG report Yaron Sheffer