[IPsec] AD VPN protocol selection
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 January 2014 19:06 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5668C1AE132 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pM1hcRS4hG6I for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ee0-x22d.google.com (mail-ee0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4161AE130 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ee0-f45.google.com with SMTP id d49so2465548eek.4 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lBPeTefR7AzvbF4ZWiqAXsRnHxll5G6ppKV/MlPpsQU=; b=1E75joH/IxrqhvJbXMvGuSTl33yAGz97U5GHnfx95Byol3T4N/BorAOepuFMXO8zLs GGU+kbbbaVh1UMAC7Lm5bf1N/QUsd7KbAGG0Mv1QYG34Je8XwAB9V2WRHQdjqAHW52Tb 7/IjqXB+EadHjQAy6oT8fXC8NK8emc3guiPMEZBZYENkSM+1sVfKEKuzOU6+BNn6BcqJ pEwx3Xmf1vLW4Uf8vM1p5dSOBpWVi+qjXJbLLDCzRJmdr0Js4W8NkhRYEIN6oaYyrcnS Ddu9eauEhAWuTyEJqMuqBpuRDxxLdH6EQg1JxODtxYCWUSRo/6is530xdT09wXegk8cg ZWMQ==
X-Received: by 10.15.24.72 with SMTP id i48mr17647737eeu.74.1389467197364; Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.9] (cablep-219-63-169.cablep.bezeqint.net. [62.219.63.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm25051870eea.10.2014.01.11.11.06.36 for <ipsec@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <52D1963B.9050106@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:06:35 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipsec <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPsec] AD VPN protocol selection
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:06:49 -0000
Hi everyone, Paul and I have asked the group to pick one of the three AD VPN proposals as a starting point for a standard. So far we have had a number of reasoned choices from those who are not authors, but unfortunately not enough to let us judge the group's consensus. I would like to request people (other than authors) who are interested in this area to post their preference to the list, along with their reasons for selecting it. We plan to decide by Feb. 6 (3 weeks from now) whether and how to move forward with the Auto-Discovery VPN protocol.
Thanks, Yaron
- [IPsec] AD VPN protocol selection Yaron Sheffer