[IPsec] HA design team started

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 18 June 2010 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DB43A698E for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.649
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.649 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.650, BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8jKiVFEoJObt for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6723A69C5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wya21 with SMTP id 21so540263wya.31 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e5+X7QO/4A8XqlCk1rPbvuTyg/CCiGYsNITcn1BPNdc=; b=B85VjRFNXYun8etV66ekpzYdCLtfLrmVt7cfxH2HgEMfiBH5IzzwYNNmv2JsCHE6KW hjo0BRxbD3fZKvyMq4rQ4M3QiISkeDpAGepBFwcXJN5UmWlkDcHyN5moWKRVQQ/jM0gR b7GwnKs5HFuThIyVRG2yRW4iZdTG2UIIxv/mE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wdIYEz5504+fPy5ATd5kByd8kqpRG/ZtuUjAFxWeI3VpR2h6DQVguKtlpcxq9SS4C9 pQ1deRpfV66TXQ67vZmQpMtEduCxLKL8jV4noCm1KMThKbUEAmSyx5lZ9nGgmRvp+8AM JLiSh+hcbhCTTZlOogQSIEZtiXWnOZRu8mThw=
Received: by 10.227.142.21 with SMTP id o21mr524567wbu.187.1276842375538; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.2] (bzq-79-178-30-177.red.bezeqint.net [79.178.30.177]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n31sm42053211wba.9.2010.06.17.23.26.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C1B1185.9090800@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 09:26:13 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [IPsec] HA design team started
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 06:26:15 -0000

Hi,

As promised, we have started a design team on IPsec HA. Paul and I have 
asked Raj Singh to lead the team. His job is to make sure that the team 
meets regularly in the next few weeks, and produces a good output 
document before the Maastricht face-to-face meeting.

The initial membership of the team is:

- Raj Singh (rsjenwar@gmail.com, lead)
- Jitender Arora (JArora@acmepacket.com)
- Min Huang (huangmin@huaweisymantec.com)
- Dacheng Zhang (zhangdacheng@huawei.com)
- Yoav Nir (ynir@checkpoint.com)
- Yaron Sheffer (yaronf.ietf@gmail.com, observer)

According to IETF rules (see 
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/design-team.htm), every design team 
needs to have a mission statement. So here it is:

Produce a high-level solution document that covers most or all of the 
issues raised by the HA problem statement (draft-ietf-ipsecme-ipsec-ha). 
Any solution should be applicable to different deployments, in order to 
accommodate the variety of existing and future IPsec products. Solutions 
should have a similar level of security as the IKE/IPsec suite.

Another process reminder: the design team's output serves as input to 
the full WG, essentially like an individual draft. So all protocol 
decisions will eventually be made by the working group.

Thanks,
	Yaron