Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-00.txt
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 13 March 2017 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A129129B9D for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j5tOy9vx9JgN for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7512B129BA7 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:43:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vhrvP5sB3z3Wd for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:42:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1489441377; bh=ql4pkc48+HlmZJ7JCwmPS5aVYGkwb4xsxikt8BHmBU4=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iYbg8ejbTcQTjzpMaOx5JjKJ53dbFOQxWNWavcEd4mIfvx90R5lT1DMTypFXQSIZL 3TyIwJRQjF7JGo2eiHKyOPVjD5VfWmQoDn4+kl12qzAPXiGiC3pSXFAM/iJE6BsNYr 3cpzMlnBBrNLRXSVb0W+czjxdOJOfmj27kgB/46M=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9-wXdjcFYdLZ for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:42:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 22:42:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C77B331C858; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 bofh.nohats.ca C77B331C858
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BDD407E851 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:42:53 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <148943892208.20401.17970719539700282400@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703131732550.30098@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <148943892208.20401.17970719539700282400@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20.999 (LRH 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/7LudWfQzfXIVKYuNayyzNVSvQLM>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 21:43:06 -0000
On Mon, 13 Mar 2017, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-00 Sadly no diff is available against draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns on the announcement page or the datatracker despite our xml tag of obsoleting it (Tero: bug for ietf tools team :) You can see the diff here: http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url2=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-00.txt&url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-pauly-ipsecme-split-dns-02.txt I'll send a list of items to the list that seem to not yet have concensus, that we can also use as a base for discussion in Chicago. Paul
- [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-… internet-drafts
- Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-… Paul Wouters