Re: issues with IKE that need resolution
Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com> Tue, 15 September 1998 20:08 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA12100 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 15 Sep 1998 16:08:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199809152026.NAA14560@chip.cisco.com>
To: Bronislav Kavsan <bkavsan@ire-ma.com>
cc: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: issues with IKE that need resolution
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 15 Sep 1998 16:08:21 EDT." <35FEC935.DF4AB143@ire-ma.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <14558.905891199.1@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 1998 13:26:40 -0700
From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
There is no recovery logic in IPSec, I guess. This sounds like an IPSecond issue (and is also not really IKE-specific). Dan. On Tue, 15 Sep 1998 16:08:21 EDT you wrote > Dan, > > Thanks for pointing out this statement in the standard, but.....what will be >the > connection recovery logic for an IPsec Client, which rebooted in the middle o >f > receiving IPsec traffic? If IPsec Client keeps silent - tt make take sender h >ours > before figuring out what happened. > > Daniel Harkins wrote: > > > Slava, > > > > Section 5.2.1 of draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-07.txt states: > > > > Use the packet's destination address (outer IP header), IPsec > > protocol, and SPI to look up the SA in the SAD. If the SA > > lookup fails, drop the packet and log/report the error. > > > > Dan.
- issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Hilarie K. Orman
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Bronislav Kavsan
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution H.Krawczyk
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Bronislav Kavsan
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Bronislav Kavsan
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Henry Spencer
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Shawn Mamros
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Shawn Mamros
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Tom Markham
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Derrell D. Piper
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Rodney Thayer
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Markku Savela
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Valery Smyslov
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Rodney Thayer
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Shawn Mamros
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution H.Krawczyk
- RE: issues with IKE that need resolution Mason, David
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Saroop Mathur
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Daniel Harkins
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Rodney Thayer
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Stephen Kent
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Michael C. Richardson
- Fwd: Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Rodney Thayer
- multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Michael C. Richardson
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Stephen Kent
- RE: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Roy Pereira
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" mcr
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Michael C. Richardson
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Michael C. Richardson
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Michael C. Richardson
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Daniel Harkins
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Daniel Harkins
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Shawn Mamros
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Scott G. Kelly
- Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: issues … Scott G. Kelly
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Paul Koning
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… Michael C. Richardson
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Michael C. Richardson
- Re: issues with IKE that need resolution Pyda Srisuresh
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… bmanning
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… Scott G. Kelly
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… Luis A. Sanchez
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: Policy instantiation/negotiation (was Re: iss… bmanning
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Daniel Harkins
- RE: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Roy Pereira
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Shawn Mamros
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Daniel Harkins
- RE: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Roy Pereira
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" mcr
- Re: multiple payloads via "ID_LIST" Scott G. Kelly