Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Last Call: draft-solinas-rfc4753bis (ECP Groups for IKE and

Scott C Moonen <smoonen@us.ibm.com> Fri, 10 July 2009 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <smoonen@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA84B3A6D36; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.387
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.387 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YtSWHsGiaJyY; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e31.co.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB05428C31F; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e31.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6A0Awmp020336; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:10:58 -0600
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (d03av05.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.85]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n6A0Fktn262152; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:15:46 -0600
Received: from d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n6A0FkEU024880; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:15:46 -0600
Received: from d03nm118.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm118.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.144]) by d03av05.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6A0FkC5024877; Thu, 9 Jul 2009 18:15:46 -0600
In-Reply-To: <p0624082ec67c23c046bd@[10.20.30.158]>
References: <p06240828c67c1fab51c3@[10.20.30.158]> <p0624082ec67c23c046bd@[10.20.30.158]>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 2FD6E8D9:6B18D0D4-852575EF:00015CD5; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
From: Scott C Moonen <smoonen@us.ibm.com>
X-MIMETrack: S/MIME Sign by Notes Client on Scott C Moonen/Raleigh/IBM(Release 8.0.2 HF623|January 16, 2009) at 07/09/2009 08:15:22 PM, Serialize by Notes Client on Scott C Moonen/Raleigh/IBM(Release 8.0.2 HF623|January 16, 2009) at 07/09/2009 08:15:22 PM, Serialize complete at 07/09/2009 08:15:22 PM, S/MIME Sign failed at 07/09/2009 08:15:22 PM: The cryptographic key was not found, Serialize by Router on D03NM118/03/M/IBM(Release 8.5|December 05, 2008) at 07/09/2009 18:15:45, Serialize complete at 07/09/2009 18:15:45
Message-ID: <OF2FD6E8D9.6B18D0D4-ON852575EF.00015CD5-852575EF.000170B2@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:15:45 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0001686D852575EF_="
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>, ipsec-bounces@ietf.org, Tim Polk <wpolk@nist.gov>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Last Call: draft-solinas-rfc4753bis (ECP Groups for IKE and
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:15:42 -0000

> I have reviewed the diffs between draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt and 
RFC 4753 and agree that they fully fix the issue that was brought to the > 
IPsecME WG last week.

Agreed; support.


Scott Moonen (smoonen@us.ibm.com)
z/OS Communications Server TCP/IP Development
http://scott.andstuff.org/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/smoonen



From:
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To:
IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Cc:
Tim Polk <wpolk@nist.gov>
Date:
07/09/2009 06:51 PM
Subject:
Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Last Call: draft-solinas-rfc4753bis (ECP Groups for IKE 
and



At 3:29 PM -0700 7/9/09, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> >IKEv2) to Informational RFC
> >
>>The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>>the following document:
>>
>>- 'ECP Groups for IKE and IKEv2 '
>>   <draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt> as an Informational RFC
>>
>>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>>final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
>>ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-08-06. Exceptionally,
>>comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
>>retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >
>>The file can be obtained via
> >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt
>>
>>
>>IESG discussion can be tracked via
> >
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=18680&rfc_flag=0


I have reviewed the diffs between draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt and RFC 
4753 and agree that they fully fix the issue that was brought to the 
IPsecME WG last week.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec