Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 18 November 2022 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8576EC14CE41 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zRy8qKD2ztBQ for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C517C14CE35 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 06:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NDKKr0R26z5JB for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:44:00 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1668782640; bh=uw4/h+0Zm+lkM6IIBNWrvljr4VKn7hCcut6hke9idNs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=F5u0cDcew6BVaFgnNkwDS19ZW+KtgBdLCkXHMvIUbqD6lQ1QvIz7d9u1DSS9UErYj mkKSVLxTn7YXduIGICFxh2oU/Fl8sFU8Ae5Yq1IqQyDbjn6+uTTt5W23M5Bbvl4AbU a5T7nFB+XoV9pi0eB+11o0kNszeZPhmqoXYkx2Jg=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JcroMB8qLdlj for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:43:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:43:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D608040D441; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:43:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D303A40D440 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:43:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 09:43:57 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <166878243717.63383.13722856524693664615@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <d5250375-e220-6b1c-ca6f-357d6c12674a@nohats.ca>
References: <166878243717.63383.13722856524693664615@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/9sOcxZ4SiN_Xz2GfelpuUtNj-Oc>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:44:08 -0000

On Fri, 18 Nov 2022, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08.txt

> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-08

This fixes the algorithm number for TIGER which was wrong, and which our
excellent people at IANA caught :)

Paul
ps. Re-reading this draft, does anyone remember why we deprecated DH22
(1024-bit MODP Group with 160-bit Prime Order Subgroup) but not DH2
(also 1024 bit MODP)