IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Wed, 21 November 2018 06:14 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F0812D4EA; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:14:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UmqnY2BvEZrj; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 881E81277BB; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id u6so3913515plm.8; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:14:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xp5HPlB5HWKMwELq9ZnlghQc2itH0OYKDgyqdOi/Bzc=; b=tEbGbP5SVqgZBEvdq3+pKEtDylQy/wQ1q1+PGBG2UobyavrHqPZv6lYVIebpLqEG+Q 2kFfd0UtGWxDsOOV5RQX5qGmFtbiZe+1fUyYqAMKRz2V3k0z3FBAUPHwMe60vUtHdCk/ clU7nSpQXrCwAqkC1t+J3VdetkexoQQl51AwcAJVUdVJ9XkqclRXa6ODdR1eghNrCAXo OKpQpxL1xEbJ9AIcq6fRZLnNnG6bmaKA2mTxf9llvevUC7KS/GPee4YxdY/ImZs4N+Zl CBCmTchht9VGW+F4plb0DSmXLvbmPS9NoGhS3hOlyuOt5HyRkNciav70onxk6O993vzB dbAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xp5HPlB5HWKMwELq9ZnlghQc2itH0OYKDgyqdOi/Bzc=; b=Gi1gN0CDmP+6qg2isbGO5YYNGp511h/P+Bj6oDkdsW3OXT6Tcu7nC8LSwzpabxjwg0 T66fwi97ApIq8ExzZ6Zjb0MnwkuBlMSSO0H6z0bQyiRr/yNP2OPZ/WXJGrO3NyXoSJOh 5eFyu8vGpgqaKD7TriHbSdQA71qNAnQVFIL55dbpI6TnA7aECzw1+drBkcsHXIl1czNM Mh952sxbQtQ9Sf8BDc9ope+9eKpn5Yslvu0mWzQKZZ81rYJkI2Iho0gCyTJD6Ccm4Clg Yxr6Ha9rluH0QHqe73p+BRO92K5j+uYnN0OY7antkn5J2wWYC+QFFdJHvg5i0EpBZtCa UqeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaoiMzQgL8uDV3QHbgKqKrpkFUsED4awhTb9A2F9d5GbDpemuZ8 xIXumemq5O/jF/yAvR8YoFvWajP/385q67QHyfQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XbysLipVuFELPbaKR6r7kJ8UqOd+6WghirqxI3vNFuB4zONJqKH1Dg153/qmo6x/b/wetuJWTETbxyqXkVy1s=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7088:: with SMTP id z8-v6mr5193157plk.329.1542780882935; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 22:14:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <154275241245.29803.13710690866636967430.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811210023070.29140@bofh.nohats.ca>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1811210023070.29140@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 01:14:30 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+MHpBokcWuaOtdpLPAn-QPiLgjiLm__M2cTgFNAaxWgTNoomw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>, ipsec@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, david.waltermire@nist.gov, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007e6219057b26aa3a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/B6X4u3W-d09bk8ZubsWWR21lWNc>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 06:14:45 -0000

Hi Paul,

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 12:25 AM Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > * Sections 3.1 and 7
> >
> > I have a hard time seeing why the length of the INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN
> attribute
> > would ever be zero. Do you expect someone to send an empty attribute? If
> not,
> > the attribute definition should be updated in Section 7.
>
> If the initiator has no domains listed, it can send a zero-length
> attribute to indicate support for this feature. The responder can then
> decide to include INTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN replies (non-zero). or perhaps
> even indicate support, but no configured domains, with a zero length
> reply.
>

That makes sense. Thanks for clarifying.

> Since the draft needs and uses a lot of example domain names, I would
> suggest
> > using a reserved TLD (e.g. ".example") from BCP32 to build up the
> examples
> > instead of using registered domain names.
>
> Yes, others have made similar comments and I will make the changes.
>

Excellent.

Regards
Suresh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email