IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-02.txt

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 05 August 2016 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B7112D5CE for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQdX4jBBhChm for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAEE12D550 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.123] (50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u75FgIFq074765 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:42:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-193.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.98.193] claimed to be [10.32.60.123]
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 08:42:17 -0700
Message-ID: <84F0EC1D-02BC-4892-9FC0-29B5E47A6D7F@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ac88df20-a086-6bbe-b90c-3d7bd27eb40c@gmail.com>
References: <20160805034543.15860.28796.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <bd8018f8-f507-5721-5cba-976dd5a013fb@gmail.com> <04fc3cc06274464ca4b94746e50a67bc@XCH-RTP-006.cisco.com> <ac88df20-a086-6bbe-b90c-3d7bd27eb40c@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.4r5234)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/BxjhpbSSkjri_IraHpZ3_Zm0n4Y>
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, Scott Fluhrer <sfluhrer@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-fluhrer-qr-ikev2-02.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:42:25 -0000

On 5 Aug 2016, at 8:23, Yaron Sheffer wrote:

> The trick to that is to add a new column to the IANA table
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/ikev2-parameters/ikev2-parameters.xhtml#ikev2-parameters-5

That's the first of two tricks: the second is getting agreement about 
the rules for the values in that column. It seems like there is still 
disagreement in the crypto community about how susceptible different 
algorithms and modes are to quantum.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email