[IPsec] Resolving Roadmap Issue #114
Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Fri, 04 December 2009 09:30 UTC
Return-Path: <kivinen@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF443A6948 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:30:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.591
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.591 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cj-WzF0r4V29 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:30:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.acr.fi [83.145.195.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5BC3A67F5 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 01:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nB49TwmO015336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:29:58 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.12.11) id nB49TuZ2013076; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:29:56 +0200 (EET)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <19224.54932.526889.724647@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:29:56 +0200
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: "Frankel, Sheila E." <sheila.frankel@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C493078C303072@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
References: <D7A0423E5E193F40BE6E94126930C493078C303072@MBCLUSTER.xchange.nist.gov>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
X-Edit-Time: 5 min
X-Total-Time: 5 min
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>, "suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com" <suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: [IPsec] Resolving Roadmap Issue #114
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:30:17 -0000
Frankel, Sheila E. writes: > Issue #114: Expired drafts, especially BEET ... > Several Internet Drafts were written to address these problems: > Extended Authentication withn IKE (XAUTH) (draft-beaulieu-ike-xauth and > its predecessor draft-ietf-ipsra-isakmp-xauth) and The ISAKMP Configuration > Method (draft-dukes-ike-mode-cfg and its predecessor draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp- > mode-cfg). These drafts did not progress to RFC status due to security > flaws and other problems related to these solutions. However, many current > IKEv1 implementations incorporate aspects of these solutions to facilitate > remote user access to corporate VPNs. These solutions were not standardized, > and different implementations implemented different versions. Thus, there > is no assurance that the implementations adhere fully to the suggested > solutions, or that one implementation can interoperate with others that > claim to incorporate the same features. Furthermore, these solutions have > known security issues. Thus, use of these solutions is not recommended. Perhaps we should add some kind of advertisement here by changing the last sentence to: "All of those problems and security issues have been solved in the IKEv2, thus use of these non-standardized IKEv1 solutions is not recommended." I.e. provide the a solution to the problem (use IKEv2) in addition to just saying that "do not use them". -- kivinen@iki.fi
- [IPsec] Resolving Roadmap Issue #114 Frankel, Sheila E.
- [IPsec] Resolving Roadmap Issue #114 Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] Resolving Roadmap Issue #114 Paul Hoffman