Re: [IPsec] Discussion of draft-pwouters-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 17 October 2022 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB221C1524B0 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yHp_nROdf1gO for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B843FC15271B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 13:37:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAECB18012; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:00:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p97WdhZqo-dZ; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:00:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AB61800C; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 17:00:54 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1666040454; bh=yFHUjFzJxVr/aWFgSjbWYybyDsT6uSECYtkZ/+RKgHY=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=hZ9gxW/Io+iBwLz3+o9NeyVMmAv0g43UvBcbWsXN7J0asMDEf+cAiT6Zef+esQfYH j9TTOnrEnKj0slfggjokpmz4ddP+YO2WJN2ORFyB8i+BZxAU5T/FEA7wikhfBSDQO2 WhPtqKta60Hp4tAtjJtJWZfpqR/XT+Un5Uhd0h5rAK5CKYPjawf7hcVpYCRCLWaWeB 5dZIgF8IgAUVNiA39XEUCVEE8yVKr9P/k8gX+HdhXMipw8365I5TclwV+XVR8RpvAJ rjR3IFA2fDwC7TZIgcGQ6fs1mOoWRRDWro4UvmBRcS46FYO0lfNPTjzx2AVUiQh6A5 1/M7DrtXdMrGA==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5D0412; Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:37:31 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, 'IPsecME WG' <ipsec@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1ba3323-5fb1-8350-3acb-5d87ad8f2b16@nohats.ca>
References: <15eb01d8dd7e$fdf158e0$f9d40aa0$@gmail.com> <10861.1665504183@localhost> <161701d8dd8c$8d042a50$a70c7ef0$@gmail.com> <20221014101504.GI2602992@gauss3.secunet.de> <03c901d8e232$3850ef20$a8f2cd60$@gmail.com> <1ba3323-5fb1-8350-3acb-5d87ad8f2b16@nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 16:37:31 -0400
Message-ID: <26977.1666039051@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/CeGcXJThiP7z8Dz-u7BeBsk1O3E>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Discussion of draft-pwouters-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2022 20:38:24 -0000

I think that the point is that even if there are n CPUs, that a sensibly
designed system might well have n+1 SAs active.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide