[IPsec] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: (with COMMENT)

[Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>]

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-split-dns/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

- General: Once my client signals support for split DNS, what prevents a server
from over claiming the domains that should be resolved via the private DNS
servers? Perhaps for purposes of employee monitoring or censoring NTFW domains?
(I've known some IT managers who would think that was a fine idea.)

§6: "the IKE connection SHOULD only process
the DNS information if the two connections are part of the same
logical entity"
How does a client determine the connections are part of the same logical
entity? I can think of some ways, but I think the draft should be give some
explicit guidance.