[IPsec] FW: BCP 146, RFC 5406 on Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 06:17 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE5C28C1EE for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:17:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hk4eSFLtRNGO for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (dlpdemo.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9B228C1ED for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:17:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix, from userid 105) id 009952AC003; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:28 +0200 (IST)
Received: from michael.checkpoint.com (michael.checkpoint.com [194.29.32.68]) by dlpdemo.checkpoint.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5C52AC001 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:27 +0200 (IST)
X-CheckPoint: {49A63316-10000-88241DC2-7B6}
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by michael.checkpoint.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n1Q6HQsZ020880 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:27 +0200 (IST)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.32.26]) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.32.26]) with mapi; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:26 +0200
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:17:24 +0200
Thread-Topic: BCP 146, RFC 5406 on Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2
Thread-Index: AcmXoRQBtQ6LvNQ9SkCbltN2qvhdBgAOI2mw
Message-ID: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC8D9A7BED544@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [IPsec] FW: BCP 146, RFC 5406 on Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 06:17:10 -0000

This BCP has been more than 6 years in the making, it is still mostly relevant, but not entirely.

	Yaron

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:29
To: ietf-announce@ietf.org; rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: BCP 146, RFC 5406 on Guidelines for Specifying the Use of IPsec Version 2


A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.

        BCP 146        
        RFC 5406

        Title:      Guidelines for Specifying the Use 
                    of IPsec Version 2 
        Author:     S. Bellovin
        Status:     Best Current Practice
        Date:       February 2009
        Mailbox:    bellovin@acm.org
        Pages:      13
        Characters: 30393
        See Also:   BCP0146

        I-D Tag:    draft-bellovin-useipsec-10.txt

        URL:        http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5406.txt

The Security Considerations sections of many Internet Drafts say, in
effect, "just use IPsec".  While this is sometimes correct, more
often it will leave users without real, interoperable security
mechanisms.  This memo offers some guidance on when IPsec Version 2
should and should not be specified.  This document specifies an Internet 
Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests 
discussion and suggestions for improvements.


BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for 
improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
  http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
  http://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist

For searching the RFC series, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfcsearch.html.
For downloading RFCs, see http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html.

Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.


The RFC Editor Team
USC/Information Sciences Institute


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

Scanned by Check Point Total Security Gateway.

Email secured by Check Point