[IPsec] Issue #33 Is TIGER specified?

Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi> Tue, 23 September 2008 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ipsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600B728C206; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:15:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE4E28C206 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-PNRRngspti for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.kivinen.iki.fi (fireball.kivinen.iki.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:100d::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E398828C1FE for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:15:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m8NEFQZN017844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:15:26 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from kivinen@localhost) by fireball.kivinen.iki.fi (8.14.3/8.12.11) id m8NEFQFY003910; Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:15:26 +0300 (EEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: fireball.kivinen.iki.fi: kivinen set sender to kivinen@iki.fi using -f
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <18648.63998.191263.660948@fireball.kivinen.iki.fi>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:15:26 +0300
From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.1
X-Edit-Time: 5 min
X-Total-Time: 9 min
Subject: [IPsec] Issue #33 Is TIGER specified?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1913875993=="
Sender: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org

> >  D.5.  Changes from draft -02 to draft -03
> >     PRF_HMAC_TIGER              3         (RFC2104)
> 
> What is unspecified in tiger, does not the rfc 2104 specify how to use
> PRF_HMAC_TIGER?
> 
> ===Not done. The base spec for TIGER is not generally available.

Wikipedia lists following reference:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ross Anderson and Eli Biham, Tiger ? A Fast New Hash Function,
proceedings of Fast Software Encryption 3, Cambridge, 1996 

http://www.cs.technion.ac.il/~biham/Reports/Tiger/tiger/tiger.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think that should be generally available enough.
-- 
kivinen@safenet-inc.com
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec