IETF Logo Mail Archive

MD5 performance limitations document

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com> Wed, 11 January 1995 01:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13614; 10 Jan 95 20:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13610; 10 Jan 95 20:09 EST
Received: from interlock.ans.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22524; 10 Jan 95 20:09 EST
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA16852 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1 for ipsec-out@ans.net); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-5); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-4); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-3); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-2); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:01:48 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>
Message-Id: <9501110101.AA27780@webster.imsi.com>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Internal Mail Agent-1); Tue, 10 Jan 1995 20:02:08 -0500
To: ipsec@ans.net
Subject: MD5 performance limitations document
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission

On the subject of MD5, has everyone read the draft on the problem with
speeding up MD5 on high end machines?

Its called draft-touch-md5-performance-00.txt.

I'm suprised that no one here has commented on it yet.

Perry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email