Re: [IPsec] Resuming the session resumption discussion

<not wearing any hats>

Based on a quick look, draft-tschofenig-ipsecme-ikev2-resumption looks
like draft-sheffer-ipsec-failover minus the bits that went beyond the
scope of this work item (like failover), so it would seem to fit the
charter text "To the degree its content falls within the scope of this
work item, text and ideas from draft-sheffer-ipsec-failover will be
used as a starting point" pretty well.

It's also similar to RFC 5077, also mentioned in the work item
description -- unlike draft-xu-ike-sa-sync, which is closer to
the original RFC 2246 session resumption than RFC 5077.

Best regards,
Pasi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipsec-bounces@ietf.org] 
> On Behalf Of ext Paul Hoffman
> Sent: 07 October, 2008 20:43
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Subject: [IPsec] Resuming the session resumption discussion
> 
> <co-chair hat on>
> 
> We now have revised drafts from the two parties who has 
> published earlier drafts on session resumption. The 
> (truncated) announcements are below.
> 
> The WG should start discussing what we want from session 
> resumption and which of these two drafts (or what ideas from 
> each of these two drafts) is of interest to the WG. As a 
> reminder, I start off with what our charter says.
> 
> Extra points are awarded for not copying this entire message 
> in your response. :-)
> 
> --Paul Hoffman
<snip>
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec