WG Last Call
Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com> Tue, 30 September 1997 19:25 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id PAA25730 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 30 Sep 1997 15:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970930141053.00aa8ce0@dilbert.is.chrysler.com>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
X-Sender: rgm3@dilbert.is.chrysler.com (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 14:10:53 -0400
To: ipsec@tis.com
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Subject: WG Last Call
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Ted and I will start work group last call on the following documents effective Oct 6, 1997: draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-08.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-oakley-02.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ipsec-doi-04.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-doc-roadmap-01.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v2-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-auth-header-01.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-auth-hmac-md5-96-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-auth-hmac-sha196-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des-expiv-00.txt The last call will end on Oct 17, 1997. Documents without substantive comments will go directly to the IESG. Common practices on cleaning up wording may result in new drafts going directly to the IESG. Those documents that the workgroup finds broken in some respect will cycle a draft version within the workgroup. draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-oakley-05.txt will start its last call shortly after Dan publishes it. The wait period will be determined by the extent of the diff file from Dan and the resolution of the issue brought up by Hugo. draft-ietf-ipsec-arch-sec-01.txt will not go into last call until a sense of working group consensus surfaces. There is no assurance that arch-01 will go into last call. Note all of these drafts represent a unified specification, and the IESG is expecting to review them as a set. Thus it behooves all of us to review them and get this done! ipsec-oakley-02.txt and perhaps ipsec-doc-roadmap-01.txt will most likely be informational, all the rest are standards track. We need everyone to review these and comment on their readiness. PLEASE include the draft name in the subject for everyone's benefit. Those that receive no major comments by 9/26/97 will start wg last call on the 9/29/97. We need to get ALL of these through wg last call before sending on to the IESG! The 3 drafts with notes attached are already not considered ready for last call by the chairs. We request the editors of these documents to submit updated versions, based on wg concensus in the next week. ---------------------------------------------------------- The following documents are still considered wg documents, but will follow the above group to the IESG. We do not want to overload them with reading and slow down approval on the core documents. Note that since the working group consensus was explicit IVs only, this list does not include any proposals that use derived, or 'implicit' IVs. If I did not get this list right in this regard, let me know! draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-3des-expiv-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des-xex-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-rc5-cbc-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cast128-cbc-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-arcfour-00.txt (author reports new ver soon) draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-blowfish-cbc-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-idea-cbc-00.txt Somehow, it seems that we need to develop applicablity statements for all of these algorithms, suggestions anyone? The following drafts, for various reasons are dead: draft-ietf-ipsec-vpn-00.txt old vpn, watch for wg BOF draft-ietf-ipsec-revised-enc-mode-01.txt roll into isakmp-oakley-05 draft-ietf-ipsec-new-esp-00.txt old esp drop draft-ietf-ipsec-ah-hmac-sha-04.txt old ah drop draft-ietf-ipsec-ah-hmac-sha-1-96-00.txt old ah drop draft-ietf-ipsec-ah-hmac-md5-96-00.txt old ah drop The following draft will be moved to IPsecond: draft-ietf-ipsec-inline-isakmp-01.txt The following drafts are released to their authors for independent Informational RFC publication AFTER the main IPsec drafts are issued as RFCs. The justification for this is either there was no wg concensus on their value to the IPsec specification, or they use protocol designs (for example, derived IV) rejected by wg concensus. draft-ietf-ipsec-cbc-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des-derived-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des3-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-desx-00.txt draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-cast-div-00.txt Thank you all. Theodore T'so and Robert Moskowitz Robert Moskowitz Chrysler Corporation (810) 758-8212 Robert Moskowitz Chrysler Corporation (810) 758-8212
- WG Last Call Robert Moskowitz