Re: [Ipsec] Negotiation of NAT-Traversal in the IKE status

Dan McDonald <danmcd@east.sun.com> Thu, 29 July 2004 01:18 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org [132.151.6.71]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA20401 for <ipsec-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:18:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BpzS2-0003P2-E8; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:11:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BpzQY-0002uL-B4 for ipsec@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:09:46 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA20063 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:09:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nwkea-mail-1.sun.com ([192.18.42.13]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BpzST-0002RQ-Dc for ipsec@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:11:46 -0400
Received: from sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.42]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6T19EJ6022292 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (punchin-danmcd.SFBay.Sun.COM [192.9.61.10]) by sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL, v2.2) with ESMTP id i6T19DWG005724 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:09:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nowhere.sfbay.sun.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (8.13.0+Sun/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6T188kx100513 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:08:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from danmcd@localhost) by nowhere.sfbay.sun.com (8.13.0+Sun/8.13.0/Submit) id i6T188Wv100512 for ipsec@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:08:08 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:08:07 -0400
From: Dan McDonald <danmcd@east.sun.com>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ipsec] Negotiation of NAT-Traversal in the IKE status
Message-ID: <20040729010807.GC100450@nowhere.sfbay.sun.com>
References: <OFF9F3C53C.09C29A77-ON85256EDF.007B7F20-85256EDF.007CBE0C@us.ibm.com> <p0611042fbd2de55225d3@[10.20.30.249]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <p0611042fbd2de55225d3@[10.20.30.249]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. - Solaris Internet Engineering
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IP Security <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org

> The NAT-T draft is waiting for draft-ietf-ipsec-udp-encaps, which is 
> waiting for a new version to deal with many comments from the IESG. 
> See 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=7148&rfc_flag=0> 
> for the issues on the latter Internet Draft.

I saw.  The last update of any sort appears to be more than two months ago.

Are we waiting for authors?  IESG?  Both?  It's not very clear where the
bottleneck is.

Dan

_______________________________________________
Ipsec mailing list
Ipsec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec