IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Call for WG adoption: draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305

"Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com> Fri, 27 February 2015 06:16 UTC

Return-Path: <svanru@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C966E1A892A for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WMq7kzNVY9eH for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com (mail-lb0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386951A8919 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbvp9 with SMTP id p9so15346570lbv.0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OC3XxE19DODhxKgyxFMSV3vnc+CasrRB/6/2/YkCY9Q=; b=RhzyNo31WEvkl1SqiT2ijhhTLZZqG3TUE170ltyMVroT8Uq7/QRw3PWowxQPOq2J+R 5j5ItLlzN1XK4J/nPku5zIY9lcc7w/xcK5vX1hDIBUvih0AtP7C9yoqirHgMzFOkNKyy fMWmI4LDwa2AonTKo/W7fvPs4fUV8MF6gkzRVLY49wvEAIDinBAKqmf76DgLLBig29zF gm4AqNvFqQj2otQ5LQG9MhA2ag0qH0OPV9ucLsVtarZP8t2LTxVbkQjo0Uy8Rtzjo7Ev Hfz9RoNwfn8Tj78zr/u4U3be/kYv604kJmvXjRHG8Fv0gPAWdEuZJJ3QAf1wVXVSTBRb ugpQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.171.65 with SMTP id as1mr10994606lbc.45.1425017802423; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from buildpc ([82.138.51.4]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm630498lam.17.2015.02.26.22.16.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Feb 2015 22:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4F716BB0A63148AC8613F5C1DDDECA8B@buildpc>
From: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
References: <86AC7585-93BD-456D-B75E-F85D2D2A2D7F@vpnc.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 09:16:54 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/Lq_S2lHOM8Y3-wBZc-YbTkeDFZo>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Call for WG adoption: draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:16:46 -0000

Hi,

I support adoption this draft as WG document.

Valery Smyslov.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "IPsecME WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:11 AM
Subject: [IPsec] Call for WG adoption: draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305


> Greetings again. A few people have expressed interest in having 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nir-ipsecme-chacha20-poly1305 as a WG 
> item for IPsecME. If you want this as a WG document, and you are willing 
> to review drafts as they move through, please say so on this thread. If 
> you are opposed to this being a WG document, please say so (and say why). 
> Thanks in advance.
>
> --Paul Hoffman
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email