[IPsec] Calls for adoption: wrap-up

[Paul Hoffman <[e-mail]>]

Greetings. A few weeks ago, we started summaries for adoption by the WG of two drafts: draft-nagayama-ipsecme-ipsec-with-qkd and draft-mglt-ipsecme-clone-ike-sa. This message concludes that there is not sufficient interest in the WG (that is, enough people who will actively contribute to the draft progression) for either draft to be advance successfully.

Both drafts had some interest from people other than the authors, but it seemed like a fair amount of that was defensive; that is, those people were willing to work on the document, but mostly to prevent bad design, not because they supported the use case. Given that, if the authors of either decide to pursue publication, it would be great if they reached out to all the people on the list who expressed opinions and try to incorporate those before moving forwards. Notes about new versions of these drafts (and other non-WG drafts) are still welcome on the list as long as they do not disrupt the ongoing WG work.

--Paul Hoffman