IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Closing #22 (was: RE: Closing #25)

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 24 November 2009 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053353A6A8D for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:44:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.981
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.981 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mwTo5s-f4NIV for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7613A6A80 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:44:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id nAOFhiR6093150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:43:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624085dc731af6e5987@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF888B367@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
References: <OF2772CC5D.A3AE43C1-ON8825766B.0069F220-8825766B.006C4336@us.ibm.com> <p06240853c730f685b129@[10.20.30.158]> <7F9A6D26EB51614FBF9F81C0DA4CFEC801BDF888B367@il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:43:42 -0800
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf@checkpoint.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Closing #22 (was: RE: Closing #25)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:44:01 -0000

At 8:58 AM +0200 11/24/09, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
>And this is exactly the table that I claim needs to remain in the spec. A list of errors - even if partial! - is essential to understanding a protocol.

The table is fine: as proven by the fact that none of many authors of this new text, the numbers are not.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email