Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-04.txt
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 18 March 2024 22:13 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1150C15198F for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fkD6B0dY-mAj for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DA92C15198B for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Tz8JM3RGCzF21; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:13:39 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1710800019; bh=UtI8uYsjT5UbvrjA9p/5HpDsGUJc29QfTPasC2GH1Eg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=iXn9/W22JIWRsbq+wv/HFVlRFAITs/fesmi00uNgI/C5UTHNiqio+/0R10+7iwpAx K0e1tbzL72vNeijGJv+uSBKDGXkZYqTRB7p2sK7tbwM8N1RvWonVBfbicnvZwSmwUq 8U1E+qhAdc1gYTGYFu2PUaFBtgzUAs6qjhRil1wY=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pkj0vFK7yHQO; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:13:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 23:13:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC34F119513A; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1501195139; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:13:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 18:13:37 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
cc: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <26104.2569.794539.699857@fireball.acr.fi>
Message-ID: <43a1ff79-c3ed-3004-d200-e1322a0488c0@nohats.ca>
References: <171074865844.55060.5287948192523319087@ietfa.amsl.com> <26104.2569.794539.699857@fireball.acr.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/Moc1Ewns4uhxot_oQP-nDBep7kY>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-04.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:13:45 -0000
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Tero Kivinen wrote: >> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance-04.txt is now > This seems to cover my comments until section 5, but does not cover > the changes for section 5.1, 6, and 9. Is there some issues with those > comments? that was an operator error on my side, -05 fixes the remaining issues. Paul
- [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-p… internet-drafts
- [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-sa-p… Tero Kivinen
- Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-multi-… Paul Wouters