IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] vendor support of RFC7427

"Hu, Jun (Nokia - US)" <jun.hu@nokia.com> Mon, 10 October 2016 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jun.hu@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EA8129749 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jj1sGJRz_if8 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-us.alcatel-lucent.com (us-hpswa-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.18.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90FB012974A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70uumx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.18.16]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 4FE55DD9F8CA8; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.66]) by us70uumx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u9AH9eE2002124 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:40 GMT
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70uusmtp4.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u9AH9etW009104 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:40 GMT
Received: from US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.10.124]) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.48]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Mon, 10 Oct 2016 13:09:40 -0400
From: "Hu, Jun (Nokia - US)" <jun.hu@nokia.com>
To: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>, IPsecME WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [IPsec] vendor support of RFC7427
Thread-Index: AdIgwO7tRgE5exa4RkO04FEvfTSIKwCAUjZSABWKLvA=
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:41 +0000
Message-ID: <876523B00C3F9D47BFD2B654D63DBF92BEAABEF8@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <876523B00C3F9D47BFD2B654D63DBF92BEAA73FA@US70UWXCHMBA05.zam.alcatel-lucent.com> <2FBB5ECC7B8043F2B4E1A6141B3D4FE1@buildpc>
In-Reply-To: <2FBB5ECC7B8043F2B4E1A6141B3D4FE1@buildpc>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.17]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_876523B00C3F9D47BFD2B654D63DBF92BEAABEF8US70UWXCHMBA05z_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/PulJAv2ylzGVzFRSnpQ7ojxshBQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] vendor support of RFC7427
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:09:44 -0000

Thanks, already noticed that thread, will have some comments on that thread

From: Valery Smyslov [mailto:svanru@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2016 11:48 PM
To: Hu, Jun (Nokia - US); IPsecME WG
Subject: Re: [IPsec] vendor support of RFC7427

Hi,

we (ELVIS-PLUS) support RFC7427 for over a year and we are interoperable with Strongswan.

However, see my message about some interoperability problems:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg10840.html

This issue is scheduled for discussion on ipsecme meeting in Seoul.

Regards,
Valery Smyslov.
----- Original Message -----
From: Hu, Jun (Nokia - US)<mailto:jun.hu@nokia.com>
To: IPsecME WG<mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2016 8:33 PM
Subject: [IPsec] vendor support of RFC7427

Hi,
I plan to support RFC7427 on my product, however as part of inter-op planning, I'd like to know current industry support status for it;
The only implementation I know so far is Strongswan which supported it since ver5.3;
It will be highly appreciated if you could share your product status or roadmap on this RFC

------
Hu Jun
IP Routing, IP/Optical Networks, Nokia
New Email: jun.hu@nokia.com<mailto:jun.hu@nokia.com>

________________________________
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org<mailto:IPsec@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email