IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-06

"Valery Smyslov" <svanru@gmail.com> Fri, 01 July 2016 13:51 UTC

Return-Path: <svanru@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E9312D636 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 06:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.491
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.491 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.77, SPF_PASS=-0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.439] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26OCc0td2daR for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 06:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x236.google.com (mail-lf0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB2A12D61C for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 06:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id h129so77762870lfh.1 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 06:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:from:to:cc:references:subject:date:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yJWvBK3XlzAVppsNqqrgjgFAmXCFuE4jpzHii9L6T4=; b=Rw/tgXP5rJsg28r06rwNYHbPGGz+JmV2Gf569h1DjVhF3Oy6Ft2WPTtdCeqb577qie W3x4yTzVrtLRfW3+1LGdoTkzQknR9OM/DFwQ4mBm4VzhFzCvQNZtOJ282WJGiuGi5IiG +m77kYiymRe5xx/Nf9PM4xWy2/Kn/Hhy/ZVrzep3ro+jSZPeQyo6qkn4uMf7C3yNJjb0 wJQUOKOsH7fMtE3mlbFAV0gI4j/yklvwrz5IH29ANwPBYCzzPt7hkfonT6zr2AL8aCdi 15+06SQhM7ZGuR+4Hw5Uv2Kq55r9l7iNPyvNZ4e6Q9NbP/P8UEKKTs1U3ifHKtGYUp0h fQyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:from:to:cc:references:subject:date :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7yJWvBK3XlzAVppsNqqrgjgFAmXCFuE4jpzHii9L6T4=; b=Ln1pgtJUS/80VRZT4694N/fuR/8VQN4W6GCulUKbM9qQys6mrTT3TFKYVuZYaMW6IP IWHoMYtWy/JeNw/JSOQtjCWhGPHpoBXPFMZo94hpEXfUsFiEAcF/jdx2oG9ffQ7cGURq y4mxVkFvwidMc843a+0BEAM6v9pc48UWFJqagfPIZHs9JLKjKiqreJ4drPVp8gS1Btd2 JYL0O74sOo5X2k95rzOg+nLXSsOHVrR9DWqjnrxUQmVEkZuE5oUaQxyQmCW0Acrd3H7l JyHeufzPJem3Pe7xUvtDWEeNDy2HQlAsNYELJ2OFlzH5qwiCH2cZeXiFreZV9SeCKFYh 1bPw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tItn58qot9gLClaXiGxskUv3KqUznzBEJeO5OY9okY/7maMCxzg53dJPY5aHLKGcw==
X-Received: by 10.25.17.92 with SMTP id g89mr5706670lfi.119.1467381101414; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 06:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from buildpc ([82.138.51.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g79sm2347034ljg.26.2016.07.01.06.51.40 (version=TLS1 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=112/168); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 06:51:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <31378E46EA0C43DAB3F34B81E2BCCEE0@buildpc>
From: Valery Smyslov <svanru@gmail.com>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1605311635540.16809@bofh.nohats.ca><4200F5373D5542C985F3D4C51609213C@buildpc><alpine.LRH.2.20.1606022148040.23132@bofh.nohats.ca><E61D75BBDD0F4A159352B3258BBAA7DE@buildpc><alpine.LRH.2.20.1606031155230.11420@bofh.nohats.ca><A6682BC2468947F1A1669A9B9D558BF5@buildpc><alpine.LRH.2.20.1606222214230.27151@bofh.nohats.ca><CE2060023EDE4BDD838CBC70763875B4@buildpc><alpine.LRH.2.20.1606300444130.4545@bofh.nohats.ca><A11D25A55311422A8F4D05C4587EE1F6@buildpc> <22390.29347.800290.864427@fireball.acr.fi>
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:51:40 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/QFFZzfa2k9_IaMh2KBKXQfW7Rug>
Cc: ipsec@ietf.org, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-06
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:51:45 -0000

Hi Tero, 

>> To be clear - I'm not against updating RFC 7296, I just think it is
>> not needed.
> 
> I think the rules are
> 
> All documents which do change IKEv2 core behavior are marked as
> updates 4306/5996/7296. Currently those are:
> 
> ...
>
> If there is negotiation of this feature before the IKEv2 behavior
> changes I think it does not need to update 7296. If this changes
> normal behavior of the IKEv2 (timers, mandatory to implement
> protection mechanisms) then it needs to update 7296.

There really is a negotiation of this feature.
That's why I don't think this document needs to update RFC 7296.

Regards,
Valery.

> I have not yet read any of the latests drafts, so I cannot say if this
> is true...
> -- 
> kivinen@iki.fi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email