Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-09: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 18 April 2024 12:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353AC151095; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:21:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1TX_g9bsLTnf; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40255C15171B; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 05:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VKxhk3L9lz5JS; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:21:26 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1713442886; bh=BmJFwvzff81eUI7r9qF7RJEbBqx0tgd4Zf7jooXQhCI=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:Cc:In-Reply-To:To; b=qGFIBLSPn3Z98ECrnCRT6X/N4s+iFcVccyBI6OObc57foiXky4L4kcUkJAP1pmAGf PG0C8a/w7EqTqnu1K/qoRRF3aXWjukXKGhW7GWHRUK42QjHDlQEbjX4ir3XM6wDWGC 8uC/g/paD3+QmqOcoIAhV5bI///Zig+VFwSogRc4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJy39ASBwRX9; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:21:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:21:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [193.110.157.208]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E43B11CB4F5; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:21:13 -0400
Message-Id: <CF1A94F8-CAC8-4906-81BF-58E2BFDF4F8A@nohats.ca>
References: <000c01da9167$b202adf0$160809d0$@elvis.ru>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi
In-Reply-To: <000c01da9167$b202adf0$160809d0$@elvis.ru>
To: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (21E236)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/S6HBv-xZDmyBZ9U9JsgYiDgzGHE>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Paul Wouters' Yes on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:21:34 -0000

> On Apr 18, 2024, at 04:09, Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> Note that the IANA registry involved here was renamed since the latest draft
>> was written :)
>> 
>> Notify Message Type  -> Notify Message Status Type
>> 
>> "IKEv2 Notify Message Types - Status Types" -> IKEv2 Notify Message Status
>> Type
> 
> This is already fixed in my local copy (the IANA was so kind to remind me about this change in a personal message :-))

Good :)

> 
>> I wonder if it would make sense to somewhere explain that the authentication
>> method refers to the AUTH payload,
> 
> Hmm... I'm not sure where to put this clarification and in which form.
> I think that there is a chance of over-specification, that might add confusion.
> You are talking only about signature authentication, and besides that
> we have PSK. In addition, IKEv2 doesn't require peer ID to match
> X.509 identity, since they are linked via the local security policy
> (i.e., it is the policy, which specify which IDs are acceptable and
> which X.509 identities they correspond to, so the strict matching
> of them is just a one particular case).
> 
> If think that this is a real concern, then do you have any concrete text in mind?

Maybe somewhere say it is the “authentication method used for the AUTH payload”.

Paul