Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 19 March 2010 19:09 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F643A67EC for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.182
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.182 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M7Pjn2zfXvmT for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM [192.245.12.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE5A3A67AE for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o2JJ9xsA063069 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:10:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p0624087bc7c97ba214b8@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <201003191902.o2JJ2Qig025943@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <p06240877c7c955d437e0@[10.20.30.158]> <201003191902.o2JJ2Qig025943@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:09:58 -0700
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2bis-08.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:09:51 -0000
At 3:02 PM -0400 3/19/10, Thomas Narten wrote: > > s3.3.4: The draft states that the list of mandatory to implement >> suites has been removed due to evolution going too fast. Is this >> acceptable? > >Put the list in a standalone document that can (in theory) be easily >updated without tying it to other changes in IKEv2? That's exactly what we did with RFC 4307 and RFC 4308. We haven't updated them, but we could. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium
- [IPsec] Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ips… Thomas Narten
- Re: [IPsec] Fwd: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-ips… Paul Hoffman