Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-yeung-g-ikev2

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Mon, 04 November 2019 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02CA1200A4 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:45:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BHqhJ5Do3_0T for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:45:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEAC1120099 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 06:45:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476FvP50sLzFfH; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:45:05 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1572878705; bh=8sp5ipZ9nasNg7FTQrxOUX/X3e/xhbcehOzD/Hyyrx8=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=qu+TQkPHQQWkszt4UzDIUm70XcNfoZPJceKHLbHzfdxpA3lj68eFafQdq2boPnISf IhkR7ax7z+C99046WN57zVCGkC+LBxZOUAH8Rzg2RamnPmsDqVv3jcrCI3bT9mWokP yhna949UyEmrQOLbme+gmqmoqBPfv2fAccoOi8qk=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qnZ05ZyTj8T; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:45:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:45:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E4696007C4D; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:45:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAC623D09D; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:45:03 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 09:45:03 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@iki.fi>
cc: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <23999.22847.102427.234841@fireball.acr.fi>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040943350.27600@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <23999.22847.102427.234841@fireball.acr.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/VlufNlqYNxC1yfLsoaIk4gUi-eo>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Adoption call for draft-yeung-g-ikev2
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 14:45:10 -0000

On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Tero Kivinen wrote:

> This is a adoption call for the draft-yeung-g-ikev2 draft to be WG
> document. This document has been around for long time, and we
> inherited it from the msec WG when it closed down. We have already
> decided to take this as an chater item so making this WG document
> should be ok.
>
> If you support adopting this document as WG Document, then send email
> indicating your support to the ipsec@ietf.org mailing-list. If you
> have any comments or reservations send them to the list too.
>
> As this document is longer, and has new exchanges for IKEv2, this is
> two week long adoption call, allowing more time to read the document
> through. This adoption call finishes 2019-11-16.

I'm in favour of adoption. As a vendor, I was waiting on implementing the
document until a rewrite that would use more IKEv2/IPsec terminology,
something Tero as chair had strongly suggested the authors do. I hope
that would still be the plan after adoption.

Paul