IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-modp-groups-04.txt

Mark Winstead <Mark.Winstead@NetOctave.com> Thu, 23 May 2002 19:36 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g4NJaCL12486; Thu, 23 May 2002 12:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA25675 Thu, 23 May 2002 14:48:37 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <49B96FCC784BC54F9675A6B558C3464E5D0E67@MAIL.NetOctave.com>
From: Mark Winstead <Mark.Winstead@NetOctave.com>
To: 'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@mit.edu>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, kivinen@ssh.fi
Cc: byfraser@cisco.com
Subject: RE: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-modp-groups-04.txt
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 14:47:49 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C2028A.56729F10"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

Since the document itself quotes sources that cite that for 256 bit keys
(like used by AES-256) require for full strength groups in the magnitude of
15400 bits, shouldn't it include a group larger than 8192 bits?

Mark Winstead
NetOctave, Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theodore Ts'o [mailto:tytso@mit.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:44 PM
> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com; kivinen@ssh.fi
> Cc: byfraser@cisco.com
> Subject: WG LAST CALL: draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-modp-groups-04.txt 
> 
> 
> 
> This is a working group last call for comments for the modp-groups-04
> draft, for progression to Proposed Standard.  This last call 
> will expire
> on June 6th.
> 
> Tero, could you please work with IANA to get assignments for the
> remaining groups (other than the 1536 group 5).  Thanks!!
> 
> 					- Ted and Barbara
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email