[IPsec] ESP's use of dummy packets?
Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com> Tue, 13 November 2007 16:36 UTC
Return-path: <ipsec-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iryl0-00052j-RN; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:58 -0500
Received: from ipsec by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Irykz-00052H-HC for ipsec-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:57 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iryky-000523-ND for ipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:56 -0500
Received: from e6.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.146]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iryks-0002zS-Vk for ipsec@ietf.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:56 -0500
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e6.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lADGcSKN019300 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:38:28 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.6) with ESMTP id lADGaoar127818 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:50 -0500
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id lADGao0x025743 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:50 -0500
Received: from austin.ibm.com (netmail2.austin.ibm.com [9.41.248.176]) by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lADGanBi025702; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:36:49 -0500
Received: from faith.austin.ibm.com (faith.austin.ibm.com [9.53.40.35]) by austin.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id lADGanmq048030; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:36:49 -0600
Received: from faith.austin.ibm.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by faith.austin.ibm.com (8.13.4/8.12.8) with ESMTP id lADGVlu5020123; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:31:47 -0600
Received: (from jml@localhost) by faith.austin.ibm.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id lADGVhrf020122; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:31:43 -0600
X-Authentication-Warning: faith.austin.ibm.com: jml set sender to latten@austin.ibm.com using -f
From: Joy Latten <latten@austin.ibm.com>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:31:43 -0600
Message-Id: <1194971503.2477.685.camel@faith.austin.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4)
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: tchicks@us.ibm.com, tgraf@redhat.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
Subject: [IPsec] ESP's use of dummy packets?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org
RFC 4303 introduces the use of dummy packets within ESP. Section 2.6 states, A transmitter MUST be capable of generating dummy packets marked with this value in the next protocol field, and a receiver MUST be prepared to discard such packets, without indicating an error. However, it is not clear to me whether an IPsec/ESP implementation MUST use this feature. That is, it MUST send out dummy packets at random intervals or in a way to shape the traffic. I interpreted the above statement to mean that an implementation must only have the capability. Further clarification if I have misinterpreted would be greatly appreciated. regards, Joy _______________________________________________ IPsec mailing list IPsec@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec
- [IPsec] ESP's use of dummy packets? Joy Latten
- Re: [IPsec] ESP's use of dummy packets? Stephen Kent
- [IPsec] Re: ESP's use of dummy packets? Michael Richardson
- [IPsec] Re: ESP's use of dummy packets? Csaba Kiraly
- [IPsec] Re: ESP's use of dummy packets? Stephen Kent
- Re: [IPsec] Re: ESP's use of dummy packets? Csaba Kiraly