Re: [IPsec] IPsecME WG Adoption call for draft-pwouters-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> writes:

> On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, Pierre Pfister (ppfister) wrote:
>
>> Since I doubt the working group would have the time and energy to work on two
>> different solutions, my support to this draft's adoption is conditioned to
>> whether the authors plan to consider addressing our concerns listed above.
>
> Speaking with no hats on here:
>
> Once the document is adopted, this question is not up to the authors but
> up to the working group.
>
>
> Putting author hat on:
>
> I think this solution is such a small solution and already has running
> code, that I would prefer the WG to quickly move this on, while also
> beginning a separate discussion on how to do various different scaling
> issues (and multi-cpu) in another way, eg by trying to work on an ESPv4
> version. But I would be sad if that work, which I expect will take some
> time, would delay this draft.

I agree with this, and support publication.

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> Paul
>
> _______________________________________________
> IPsec mailing list
> IPsec@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec

Re: [IPsec] IPsecME WG Adoption call for draft-pwouters-ipsecme-multi-sa-performance

Attachment: signature.asc