[IPsec] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: (with COMMENT)

[Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-multiple-ke/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This document has seven authors while the RFC Editor guideline is five.  Have
we considered moving a couple of them to Section 6?

While not a DISCUSS-level concern, I would really like to see more division
among the actions requested of IANA in Section 4.  There are 12 actions across
two sections; it wouldn't take much to put each action in its own section, for
example.  I can see in the datatracker that IANA has already indicated they
understand what's being asked of them, but still I think it's helpful to other
readers to organize it.