[IPsec] [draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-00] Comments about references

Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com> Tue, 03 February 2009 17:36 UTC

Return-Path: <ipsec-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ipsec-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7D53A6C44; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EE73A6C44 for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8qmEFg7yK2nj for <ipsec@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB2A3A6B96 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:36:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so936452fgb.41 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:35:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HTn2Tydg8vS18pYmMPx2rIk1W+cf0+XdAmTMQauzgFE=; b=FJPCPZq2KILGgPTIZJNLX8QK/1Dkb/bt7Wk6fqGckHLUql7Z8nRybtzJ/bgIbqeys0 xgnEvQCtGw2AyxwSCSrZJICHnv+hG3B0c95IcMBk05SHc/gGByemSfd4jOY28VNBZK03 lHwy83hUj2cG7123hUeJzrr8pgr5Qvuz6NAQQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=H5Zh1gbDyKqGjEAIEr4pd4KVvDsO6cx/rsAOvDR0oy1xg7+QydHnKR/aCa8kRmlQ4A nd/npcM+ujnXPEPZSnKxVAyhcL8rzm235jVHMcVdDlB0M4z/evYEZKqzl4QzEFi5jbHl yeL0p6/CUFDAVuX3K1hy1w+WgIFnHuF02Y/iE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.86.59.2 with SMTP id h2mr5743fga.30.1233682554421; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:35:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:35:54 +0100
Message-ID: <729b68be0902030935g39daeb27i6ab2e2d00221808b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
To: IPsec WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: [IPsec] [draft-ietf-ipsecme-roadmap-00] Comments about references
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipsec-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

as promised during the interim meeting, here are comments about references:

o IPSECKEY implementation

IPSECKEY RR has been implemented here:
http://www.idsa.prd.fr/index.php?page=code&lang=en

and included in BIND after (cf. https://www.isc.org/about/pr/2007032700).

o PANA and IPsec

AFAIK, it was decided in Dublin meeting that PANA WG has to work again
on PANA based IPsec bootstrapping
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pana-ipsec-07) but, as I didn't
attend Minneapolis meeting, I don't know whether this is still the
case ...

o Pfr+ use

Pfr+ is used in RFC 5295 (cf. section 3.1.2).

Hope that helps.

Best regards.

JMC.
_______________________________________________
IPsec mailing list
IPsec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec