RE: AD requests WG review of final revisions to draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-06.txt <= 48hrs please

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 27 February 2004 17:14 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA14643 for <ipsec-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:14:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA14552 Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:45:54 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: kent@localhost
Message-Id: <p06020402bc650aaf651b@[10.1.187.100]>
In-Reply-To: <200402271022.i1RAM1nb006444@rs9.luxsci.com>
References: <200402271022.i1RAM1nb006444@rs9.luxsci.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:55:30 -0500
To: William Dixon <ietf-wd@v6security.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: RE: AD requests WG review of final revisions to draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-reqts-06.txt <= 48hrs please
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

William,

Thanks for the response at this late date. Since you indicated a 
willingness to adopt my suggested text for the first issue, I'm happy 
going forward.

Steve