IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 28 April 2021 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279283A116C for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:49:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T6OqITxWYWs4 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C3E13A1165 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 08:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FVjjV2ccwzKH0 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:49:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1619624942; bh=p4xWH76qVU0ZZBR5QRhJ9p7/qtuuuhWcCv/DNF15N1Q=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=LnsMqeLMOqmRu4mmPPeXz3RI6Rhz0qAMPJkbvIjBfjcL6LR7JMMMgA15rgPcjoezk 38VoxQPjQ5IihpfI3fmH/m1Awcv1+ftFuk9KsSi1PxiE0kGFbXAbhQBS8srZFo/urm 5+H8kZjpBVIITiZc2SEa04yauQQD4K2ZebXzgGT8=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0fNZNcjRpH23 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:49:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF6ED6029A70; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CC666B7C for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:48:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 11:48:59 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: ipsec@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <161962448020.12575.13131318934919776038@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <40493aa4-ba3a-ad32-fda2-f5ab24d78296@nohats.ca>
References: <161962448020.12575.13131318934919776038@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/g62-NU24M4JAHuyYRTsBze_7vAQ>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:49:09 -0000

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> Subject: [IPsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt

Looks like the datatracker email does not post the diff between
different document names :P

The diff is:

https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-pwouters-ikev1-ipsec-graveyard-06.txt&url2=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev1-algo-to-historic-00.txt

Basically, it removes the IANA request to close the IKEv1 registries,
changes draft name / title to avoid "graveyard" and lists some items
as bullet points and sections, and changes some subjective wording to
more objective language.

I'm not saying this is ready for WGLC, but ....

Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email