IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPsec] Virtual interim about re-designing ESP?

Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Wed, 23 November 2022 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Steffen.Klassert@secunet.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6FBC14CEEB for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TOQ0iewPTY3D for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com (a.mx.secunet.com [62.96.220.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFF8AC14F741 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 23:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55308200BB; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet
Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G_3gsdoUZY6z; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mailout1.secunet.com (mailout1.secunet.com [62.96.220.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE172200AC; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from cas-essen-01.secunet.de (unknown [10.53.40.201]) by mailout1.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B7A80004A; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100
Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100
Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3D80F31829D7; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:03:25 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters=40aiven.io@dmarc.ietf.org>, ipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20221123070325.GK424616@gauss3.secunet.de>
References: <20221121124714.GA704954@gauss3.secunet.de> <CAGL5yWYbFLh4BXmy2QPKd8=P-Jd9ERXheK7M_dDfbZTGACPWew@mail.gmail.com> <4241.1669154378@localhost> <CADZyTknznY54J_8Z-PF8Uz_LVx4u2Va_3qXmmELysY0Vgn4XwA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTknznY54J_8Z-PF8Uz_LVx4u2Va_3qXmmELysY0Vgn4XwA@mail.gmail.com>
X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197)
X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/mx_k4HMOfiiffrTiI3Ivvj8gcg8>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Virtual interim about re-designing ESP?
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 07:03:32 -0000

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 05:16:08PM -0500, Daniel Migault wrote:
> I support Bob's suggestion.
> I also believe that multicore will be addressed by design. I do want to
> have some mechanisms like [1] to be included by design. That said, I would
> like [1] to start on ESPv3 and take the output back to ESPv-4 as opposed to
> waiting for ESP-v4.

I disagree. If we touch ESP, everything should be on the table and
we should consider that all together.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status