[IPsec] Auto Discovery VPN Problem statement
Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 29 May 2012 20:14 UTC
Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E0311E8168 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.331
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ps5ZHzcGPy0Q for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB9121F8498 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so3176433yhq.31 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RZ25DlIbm+twMV5AsQgvxjeNr256QvaU6HbeiFzaPog=; b=w0+yusSq3mh266mx2PsaAUn+JTZGINiiT+eaBcAKtlVVzzqGhyW2P1t1Usw1AA1qfk M1DQYer/toNCLpjDX76l6xQQ3NWDqp8X3EpVndLC00Cfsxu2z2HrBjBgU3dKZJoF+AC4 CZNoZMaxJ8w7PSKgSAvR1o5Jgxvaeeycd5tS2gTbhIBuon0z2Kdp50fwOWW8zJ/9DDji uqrzoxt8l6SfiErv1n5a2EBbOsFJwb4rvzC4kRBFq/C6mEWOJ3DIBz1JTFGobsT84jRP Kq9VNgC3uzNLQ2zH/VrasWoggxhrmCAxjggGMYB4NWRkXf9LqpxdDlpICOjy+C8tag/1 XaDA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.28.162 with SMTP id c2mr12722077oeh.3.1338322487544; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.19.201 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:14:47 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHQeWa9ZeZ0J=ZJ=rOkUoQybi8=pDEhMPhxx7Ea+aWyT8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: IPsecme WG <ipsec@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8ff1c762770d6b04c1327c7c"
Subject: [IPsec] Auto Discovery VPN Problem statement
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 20:14:53 -0000
Hi folks, We published the draft on the updated problem statement: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsecme-p2p-vpn-problem-01.txt I have tried my best to address most concerns here. Your reviews and discussions on this would be of great help. On another note I got interest from different folks, and Huawei-Symantec and NTT-MCL have published a draft on a similar use case earlier. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ko-vaas-problem-statement-01 . We will work with them to see how we to update any new use cases/ requirements they may have. Thanks, Vishwas
- [IPsec] Auto Discovery VPN Problem statement Vishwas Manral