[IPsec] [Errata Verified] RFC7296 (6667)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 01 September 2021 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CEB3A0899; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-C0JM0jFzWp; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A953A08A7; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 89D75F40796; Wed, 1 Sep 2021 08:43:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: guqingyuan00@gmail.com, charliekaufman@outlook.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, nir.ietf@gmail.com, pe@iki.fi, kivinen@iki.fi
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: kaduk@mit.edu, iesg@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20210901154359.89D75F40796@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 08:43:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/nl80sxrOhheUUqVPFNbvqPhKI0E>
Subject: [IPsec] [Errata Verified] RFC7296 (6667)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 15:44:47 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7296,
"Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6667

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Qingyuan Gu <guqingyuan00@gmail.com>
Date Reported: 2021-08-30
Verified by: Benjamin Kaduk (IESG)

Section: 3.3

Original Text
-------------
   the different groups.  For example, to propose ESP with (3DES or
   AES-CBC) and (HMAC_MD5 or HMAC_SHA), the ESP proposal would contain
   two Transform Type 1 candidates (one for 3DES and one for AEC-CBC)
   and two Transform Type 3 candidates (one for HMAC_MD5 and one for
   HMAC_SHA).

Corrected Text
--------------
   the different groups.  For example, to propose ESP with (3DES or
   AES-CBC) and (HMAC_MD5 or HMAC_SHA), the ESP proposal would contain
   two Transform Type 1 candidates (one for 3DES and one for AES-CBC)
   and two Transform Type 3 candidates (one for HMAC_MD5 and one for
   HMAC_SHA).

Notes
-----
"AES" is misspelled as "AEC".

--------------------------------------
RFC7296 (draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Internet Key Exchange Protocol Version 2 (IKEv2)
Publication Date    : October 2014
Author(s)           : C. Kaufman, P. Hoffman, Y. Nir, P. Eronen, T. Kivinen
Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
Source              : IP Security Maintenance and Extensions
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG