Re: [IPsec] virtual interim meetings and "freeconference"

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 17 October 2013 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D45E11E8295 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9sJB2DkPOlng for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444D411E81A2 for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9HHkVhd009683 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:46:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-0-66-41.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.0.66.41] claimed to be [10.20.30.90]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <15968.1382030853@sandelman.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 10:46:31 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1446A6D7-A20D-4A10-9BB1-F192D488B92B@vpnc.org>
References: <7648545.126141382027750318.JavaMail.SYSTEM@priexchange01.ca.primus> <15968.1382030853@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] virtual interim meetings and "freeconference"
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 17:46:51 -0000

On Oct 17, 2013, at 10:27 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:

> The IPsecME WG had a virtual interim meeting last Wednesday.
> It used a conference bridge at: +1 712-775-7400 run, I believe by
> FreeConference.
> 
> I was unable to reach it from a number of landlines, and mobile.  I got
> in through GoogleTalk's outdial service, but there was significant quality
> issues.
> 
> It did not in the end hinder my participation, but it was annoying.
> 
> I would like to request that future virtual interim meetings use
> a secretariat provided conference bridge.

This is the first we've heard of the problem, but that does sound significant enough for us not to use that service any more. We'll go with the IETF's WebEx service for future interims.

--Paul Hoffman