Re: IBM US Patent #5,148,479

"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com> Tue, 25 April 1995 14:08 UTC

Received: from interlock.ans.net by nis.ans.net with SMTP id AA08118 (5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <archive-ipsec@nis.ans.net>); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 10:08:09 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net id AA20140 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for ipsec-out@ans.net); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:59:00 -0400
Message-Id: <199504251359.AA20140@interlock.ans.net>
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-4); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:59:00 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-3); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:59:00 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:59:00 -0400
Received: by interlock.ans.net (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:59:00 -0400
To: Scott Bradner <sob@newdev.harvard.edu>
Cc: amir@watson.ibm.com, Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu, ipsec@ans.net, jis@mit.edu, jwlowe@VNET.IBM.COM
Subject: Re: IBM US Patent #5,148,479
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:30:12 EDT." <199504251327.AA24744@interlock.ans.net>
Reply-To: perry@imsi.com
X-Reposting-Policy: redistribute only with permission
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 1995 09:58:30 -0400
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>

Scott Bradner says:
> RFCs contain rather more than just protocol specs, see the recient
> one which is a copy of the ISOC/SUN agreement on SUN RPC

See also RFC1170 by PKP concerning public key patents.

However, I suppose Jeff Schiller ought to be handling this from
here...

.pm