Re: IPsec IANA registry

Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net> Wed, 10 April 2002 19:36 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g3AJa3m17435; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 12:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA20244 Wed, 10 Apr 2002 14:59:50 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 15:11:36 -0400
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: IPsec IANA registry
In-Reply-To: <p05101506b8da1c71cad0@[165.227.249.20]>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1020410150806.26870K-100000@spsystems.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Paul Hoffman / VPNC wrote:
> In group (c), there are a bunch of EC numbers from now-expired 
> Internet Drafts that are expected to be re-issued and probably move 
> to RFC. Also in group (c), Marcus Leech reserved values for AES and 
> SHA-2 on the assumption that Internet Drafts and RFCs would follow...

There is also the infamous group 5, although we can hope that it will
"go straight" with draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-modp-groups-04.txt or some
immediate descendant thereof.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net

IPsec IANA registry Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: IPsec IANA registry Henry Spencer
Re: IPsec IANA registry Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Re: IPsec IANA registry Paul Hoffman / VPNC