Re: [IPsec] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-09: (with COMMENT)

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 18 April 2024 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45A9C14F6AC; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.43
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3bqoLHtNiRhn; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6D8C14F683; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4VL1vv27SBz5JS; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:31:23 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1713454283; bh=D5xrajJLOgNvlp1dwmzyXsXIwBKNiS0vejvEOZldDgk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=pfhoz7R6lUXbP3Ch4Hr1sKcRhrqqT3BYLm9AYX6X+b9FlWxh5NV2vbIwCFNNFrAJd 9xNoVbeLG0OdZeNZSAa0M50LW1lVLqSLhIQEGboF6QTPZxEBwE1W9bdaHvoYt2zSeo IC8MRfUzyjlRC6lpvCGhOiDjYxYYcadiq4ZrdDF0=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lbIwJPvBCqvn; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9161711CB8B0; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE6811CB8AF; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:31:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:31:21 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
cc: 'Murray Kucherawy' <superuser@gmail.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce@ietf.org, ipsecme-chairs@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, kivinen@iki.fi
In-Reply-To: <002901da919a$1a68fc50$4f3af4f0$@elvis.ru>
Message-ID: <76735323-f71b-d8e6-f017-d0f15d060916@nohats.ca>
References: <171344893281.53800.6089776771759682321@ietfa.amsl.com> <002901da919a$1a68fc50$4f3af4f0$@elvis.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/rjVS37H6vDdMNb6_w7WG5ZUTFvM>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-auth-announce-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 15:31:30 -0000

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Valery Smyslov wrote:

>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> The shepherd writeup says there are implementers, but no implementations.  Is
>> that right?
>
> Yes, that's right. We are in the process of implementing it.

libreswan will also implement this.