IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Remove little-used algorithms from IKEv2

Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 14 March 2002 22:22 UTC

Received: from lists.tislabs.com (portal.gw.tislabs.com [192.94.214.101]) by above.proper.com (8.11.6/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g2EMMx426025; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:22:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lists.tislabs.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA06335 Thu, 14 Mar 2002 16:41:23 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: phoffvpnc@mail.vpnc.org
Message-Id: <p05101411b8b6cbdb933d@[165.227.249.20]>
In-Reply-To: <15505.5298.749714.629549@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
References: <p0510140ab8b6a4514ed7@[165.227.249.20]> <15505.5298.749714.629549@pkoning.dev.equallogic.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:52:49 -0800
To: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Remove little-used algorithms from IKEv2
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Precedence: bulk

At 4:22 PM -0500 3/14/02, Paul Koning wrote:
>I agree with your list.  In fact, I'd add a * to one more: ENCR_CAST.

That's OK with me. I left it on the list because I saw people do 
interop tests 18 months ago, and they said it worked first time. On 
the other hand, we now have AES, so having a backup to TripleDES (or 
whatever the English word for the thing that is backed up by 
TripleDES) is not an issue.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status