Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU> Tue, 22 July 1997 22:21 UTC
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by portal.ex.tis.com (8.8.2/8.8.2) id SAA07731 for ipsec-outgoing; Tue, 22 Jul 1997 18:21:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 18:29:40 -0400
Message-Id: <199707222229.SAA17948@dcl.MIT.EDU>
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@MIT.EDU>
To: mark@mentat.com
Cc: kseo@bbn.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: Marc Hasson's message of Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:52:53 -0700, <199707222152.OAA03654@feller.mentat.com>
Subject: Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP
Address: 1 Amherst St., Cambridge, MA 02139
Phone: (617) 253-8091
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 1997 14:52:53 -0700 From: mark@mentat.com (Marc Hasson) Then I guess you're saying that the latest ESP draft has to get its mandatory to implement reference (MS97) fixed. Neither the authorship nor the title of that reference matches your "des-expiv" reference above, which is why I had asked if the *implicit" version is what the new ESP draft was truly referencing. draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-des-derived-00.txt matches the MS97 reference for *both* authorship and title and is also a very recent draft. Yes, this is correct. My apologies to Steve and Karen for not catching this when reading earlier versions of their text. See my previous message about needing to proof the ESP and AH drafts against the architecture document with respect to the current mandated algorithms. I believe it will make the document more understable in the end, but it does mean we have to do a bit more work to make sure the text in those documents match the text in the architecture document. - Ted
- New draft -- IPSEC ESP Karen Seo
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Marc Hasson
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Karen Seo
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Marc Hasson
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Theodore Y. Ts'o
- Re: New draft -- IPSEC ESP Stephen Kent