Re: [IPsec] Work on the IPsec-related YANG documents

Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com> Wed, 19 August 2015 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E861A8826 for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlRuu2wwcoVH for <ipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5F3B1A8A1A for <ipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 13:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-f79ef6d000007f54-2d-55d48f9a74ac
Received: from EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.84]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 18.C0.32596.A9F84D55; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:15:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC004.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Wed, 19 Aug 2015 16:54:14 -0400
From: Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>
To: "ipsec@ietf.org" <ipsec@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [IPsec] Work on the IPsec-related YANG documents
Thread-Index: AdDavOF6IDahib5jQ1OCB9TH2qQKjw==
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:54:14 +0000
Message-ID: <BF6E0BD839774345977891C597F8B50C213181D4@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPiO6s/iuhBnfvq1vs3/KCzYHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGfc6rrIWrGev2HFRvIHxH2sXIyeHhICJxM1Pe9ggbDGJC/fW A9lcHEICRxklTkzYwg7hLGeUOHn3PlgHm4CBxIaPW5hAbBEBVYlTy6aDxYUFbCU6T39ihYg7 SbzefooFwtaTOHj/AzuIzQJU33ljIZDNwcEr4Csxr08BJMwItPj7qTVgI5kFxCVuPZnPBHGQ gMSSPeeZIWxRiZePYY5WlNjXP50dol5HYsHuT2wQtrbEsoWvwep5BQQlTs58wjKBUXgWkrGz kLTMQtIyC0nLAkaWVYwcpcWpZbnpRgabGIFhfEyCTXcH456XlocYBTgYlXh4FxRdDhViTSwr rsw9xCjNwaIkzusYlRcqJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgVGiLo1P47GGj//Mx+qN 7ot2G506Kbb5ptC6U4y7PufGLX3nZFjz1N/qlP5fmctLNYotNp8RCRILrnrzwCWlT70mbY// i5sBATt2mFbN3dwj57Gt8LD41WD95cFTGK6bSqZ9cv3F7PKxzLMibKFg9DnH9W1vl3+//lc5 q4+jctLB06uOFzsr1SuxFGckGmoxFxUnAgCiaXH5RAIAAA==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipsec/y3LEtF5cyGf8zQW_o5Lc_YWko5s>
Subject: Re: [IPsec] Work on the IPsec-related YANG documents
X-BeenThere: ipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of IPsec protocols <ipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipsec>, <mailto:ipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:54:18 -0000

Hi Paul,

The authors are in the process of merging the three YANG documents
you mentioned.

Thanks,
Helen

-----Original Message-----

> From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
> To: ipsec@ietf.org
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:02:49 -0700
> Subject: [IPsec] Work on the IPsec-related YANG documents
>
> Greetings. At the meeting in Prague, there was discussion of the 
> IPsec-related YANG documents (draft-tran-ipecme-yang-ipsec, 
> draft-wang-ipsecme-ipsec-yang, and draft-wang-ipsecme-ike-yang). Given 
> the low level of understanding of YANG, it would be great if the authors 
> of the three documents could either combine the documents or, failing 
> that, agree on some wording for the WG about what each doc does and why 
> they should exist in parallel. After that, the WG will be in a better 
> position to think about whether we want to adopt them as WG items.
> 
> --Paul Hoffman